What explained by Roy Suryo as expert witnesses who was presented by the public prosecutor (JPU=Jaksa Penuntut Umum) in the council on Marcella Zalianty and Ananda Mikola case be broken by Ruby Alamsyah Z, digital forensic Analyst submitted by expert witnesses OC Kaligis, Ananda Mikola’s power law,

Thursday at the Central Jakarta District Court (PN Jakpus) in the council of Marcella and Ananda, Roy states that he has succeeded bring back, with a recovery program, and analyzing the images with the nine-image of Agung Setiawan without clothes and 10 messages sms that one of them allegedly sent by Marcella from the mobile phone Hariyanto Mohammad, one of Marcella’s employee.

the case of Ananda in the council this Monday, still in Jakpus PN, Ruby confess that he is the only first people at Indonesia become a member of International High Technology Crime Investigation Association (HTCIA)

Ruby said, all that has been presented by Roy is not valid and not quality as evidence. “According to the standard international, that cloning should be done in front of the mobile phone owner, Mohammad Hariyanto (Marcella employees), “said Ruby.” After that, it was agreed through a digital finger print. Then, by the second new -party analysts and HP-owners and given to the Analyst for digital forensic analysis because, if not so, with the vulnerable irregularities.

Ruby said again, when Roy cast about the data , there is only Roy and Kapolres. “He (Roy) also make statements (about the results analysis) and shows the results analysis to the journalist. That violate the code of ethics, “he said.
Continued, referring to international standards, Roy analysis results are invalid and not qualified as evidence. “Roy Suryo does not have as a standard operational telecommunications experts, “he said again./p2t

source:http://entertainment.kompas..com/rea….Ananda Mikola

[Translate]

English العربية Indonesia 日本語 中文 (简体) powered by